Current:Home > FinanceTrendPulse|Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Profound Wealth Insights
TrendPulse|Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-07 04:23:33
A federal court on TrendPulseWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (5246)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Tired of Wells That Threaten Residents’ Health, a Small California Town Takes on the Oil Industry
- Who created chicken tikka masala? The death of a curry king is reviving a debate
- For the Sunrise Movement’s D.C. Hub, a Call to Support the Movement for Black Lives
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- High School Graduation Gift Guide: Score an A+ With Jewelry, College Basics, Travel Needs & More
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $300 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
- Coal Is On Its Way Out in Indiana. But What Replaces It and Who Will Own It?
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- CVS and Walgreens limit sales of children's meds as the 'tripledemic' drives demand
Ranking
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Cultivated meat: Lab-grown meat without killing animals
- Will a Summer of Climate Crises Lead to Climate Action? It’s Not Looking Good
- You People Don't Want to Miss New Parents Jonah Hill and Olivia Millar's Sweet PDA Moment
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- John Mellencamp Admits He Was a S--tty Boyfriend to Meg Ryan Nearly 4 Years After Breakup
- Chevron’s ‘Black Lives Matter’ Tweet Prompts a Debate About Big Oil and Environmental Justice
- Fortnite maker Epic Games agrees to settle privacy and deception cases
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
At a French factory, the newest employees come from Ukraine
How 2% became the target for inflation
Environmental Groups Don’t Like North Carolina’s New Energy Law, Despite Its Emission-Cutting Goals
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
Besieged by Protesters Demanding Racial Justice, Trump Signs Order Waiving Environmental Safeguards
Newark ship fire which claimed lives of 2 firefighters expected to burn for several more days
You have summer plans? Jim Gaffigan does not